Benton Combined Utility Enterprise, AR — Moody’s removes Benton, AR’s negative outlook, affirms A1 issuer and utility ratings and A2 special tax rating

Ranking Motion: Moody’s gets rid of Benton, AR’s negative outlook, affirms A1 issuer and utility ratings and A2 specific tax ratingGlobal Credit rating Investigate – 17 Mar 2022New York, March 17, 2022 — Moody’s Traders Company has affirmed the A1 issuer rating for the Town of Benton, AR as very well as the A1 earnings bond score for the Benton Combined Utility Enterprise, AR, and A2 score for the Cash Enhancement Revenue Bonds Collection 2012 and 2015. The issuer ranking is equivalent to a rating that we would assign to a typical Normal Obligation Unlimited Tax (GOULT) debt challenge and is used as a reference for scores assigned working with the US Neighborhood Government General Obligation Credit card debt methodology. Moody’s has also removed the negative outlook for all rated personal debt of the town, which includes all rated exclusive tax bonds.Rankings RATIONALEThe A1 issuer score displays the city’s moderately sized tax base that is increasing and favorably found within the Little Rock (Aa1) metropolitan statistical space (MSA). The town is reliant on product sales tax profits and normal fund reserves are underneath median. The credit card debt stress is modest and pensions are a bit elevated.The A1 score for the city’s utility displays the moderately sized organization with a secure consumer base, enhancing liquidity situation pushed by elevated utility rates, modest financial debt burden and common lawful provisions.The A2 ranking for the Cash Advancement Earnings Bonds (Franchise Fees) displays the bonds broad income pledge, satisfactory authorized provisions and adequate coverage regardless of a pledged profits stream that fluctuates based mostly on utility utilization.Ranking OUTLOOKOutlooks are generally not assigned to area governing administration credits with this total of debt excellent.Variables THAT COULD Direct TO AN Improve OF THE RATINGSIssuer Rating- Routine maintenance of larger operational reserves- Diversification of earnings resources- Content maximize of the city’s tax baseUtility Company- Materially stronger liquidity placement- Noticeably improved financial debt service coverageFranchise Costs Distinctive Tax Bonds- Advancement in pledged revenues, leading to a pattern of materially improved debt support protection- Drop of financial debt profileFACTORS THAT COULD Guide TO A DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGSIssuer Score- Craze of declining product sales tax revenues- Craze of functioning deficits and narrowing reserves- Product contraction in the tax foundation- Considerable boost of pension burdenUtility Business- Important drop in debt company coverage- Deterioration of the utilities reserve positionFranchise Expenses Distinctive Tax Bonds- Decline in pledged revenues, primary to narrowing of credit card debt assistance protection- Considerable extra borrowing Lawful Safety Issuer Ranking – Not applicable Utility Debt – The bonds are backed by a pledge of and payable from the web revenues derived from the functions and of the city’s electrical, drinking water, and sewer amenities.Franchise Charges Distinctive Tax Bonds- The bonds are backed by revenues derived by the city from all franchise charges gathered from community utilities for the privilege of utilizing streets, highways, and other public areas in the city. USE OF PROCEEDS Not applicable PROFILE Benton, AR is found in Saline County, 22 miles southwest of Minor Rock (Aa1) and within just the Very little Rock-North Minor Rock-Conway MSA. The populace of the city in 2019 was 35,700. The utility method, consisting of drinking water, sewer and electric powered utilities is owned by the city and operated by the Benton Public Utility Commission. The utility serves about 12,400 household electric customers and 15,000 residential sewer prospects.METHODOLOGYThe principal methodology made use of in the issuer ranking was US Nearby Authorities General Obligation Financial debt revealed in January 2021 and available at The principal methodology employed in the profits ratings was US Municipal Utility Earnings Credit card debt released in October 2017 and accessible at The principal methodology used in the specific tax ratings was US Public Finance Distinctive Tax Methodology published in January 2021 and accessible at Alternatively, you should see the Rating Methodologies website page on for a copy of these methodologies.REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor even more specification of Moody’s essential ranking assumptions and sensitivity investigation, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody’s Score Symbols and Definitions can be located at: rankings issued on a plan, collection, group/class of credit card debt or security this announcement offers certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each ranking of a subsequently issued bond or notice of the similar series, class/class of financial debt, stability or pursuant to a system for which the ratings are derived exclusively from present ratings in accordance with Moody’s score techniques. For rankings issued on a help service provider, this announcement offers specified regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating rating motion on the assist supplier and in relation to just about every distinct credit ranking action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider’s credit rating rating. For provisional rankings, this announcement provides specific regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may possibly be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the credit card debt, in every case wherever the transaction construction and phrases have not improved prior to the assignment of the definitive ranking in a manner that would have influenced the score. For more details remember to see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity web page for the respective issuer on disclosures contained in this press launch utilize to the credit rating score and, if applicable, the similar ranking outlook or score review.Moody’s typical ideas for examining environmental, social and governance (ESG) dangers in our credit examination can be discovered at see for any updates on adjustments to the guide rating analyst and to the Moody’s lawful entity that has issued the rating.Remember to see the rankings tab on the issuer/entity page on for supplemental regulatory disclosures for every single credit ranking. LeRoy Ousley Direct Analyst REGIONAL_SOUTHWEST Moody’s Investors Support, Inc. Plaza Of The Americas 600 North Pearl St. Suite 2165 Dallas 75201 JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Consumer Service: 1 212 553 1653 David Strungis Additional Get in touch with REGIONAL_MIDWEST JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Releasing Office: Moody’s Traders Services, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Services: 1 212 553 1653 © 2022 Moody’s Company, Moody’s Investors Support, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliate marketers (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.Credit Rankings ISSUED BY MOODY’S Credit score Scores Affiliate marketers ARE THEIR Present Opinions OF THE RELATIVE Upcoming Credit Threat OF ENTITIES, Credit history COMMITMENTS, OR Financial debt OR Personal debt-LIKE SECURITIES, AND Resources, Solutions, Providers AND Info Released BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) May Involve This kind of Existing Views. MOODY’S DEFINES Credit Chance AS THE Risk THAT AN ENTITY May NOT Satisfy ITS CONTRACTUAL Money OBLIGATIONS AS THEY Arrive Owing AND ANY Believed Financial Loss IN THE Party OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE Applicable MOODY’S Ranking SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR Info ON THE Sorts OF CONTRACTUAL Financial OBLIGATIONS Resolved BY MOODY’S Credit history Scores. Credit score Ratings DO NOT Deal with ANY OTHER Possibility, Such as BUT NOT Confined TO: LIQUIDITY Chance, Market place Value Threat, OR Selling price VOLATILITY. Credit score Ratings, NON-Credit score ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER Thoughts Involved IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF Existing OR Historic Fact. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS May ALSO Contain QUANTITATIVE Product-Centered ESTIMATES OF Credit history Chance AND Linked Opinions OR COMMENTARY Released BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS Affiliate marketers. MOODY’S Credit history Rankings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Opinions AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT Constitute OR Deliver Investment decision OR Fiscal Assistance, AND MOODY’S Credit score Scores, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Viewpoints AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT Give Tips TO Acquire, Offer, OR Hold Certain SECURITIES. MOODY’S Credit Rankings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Viewpoints AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT Comment ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN Expense FOR ANY Certain Investor. MOODY’S Difficulties ITS Credit rating Rankings, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER Views AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND Knowing THAT Each individual Investor WILL, WITH Due Treatment, MAKE ITS Have Research AND Evaluation OF Every single Security THAT IS Beneath Thought FOR Purchase, Holding, OR SALE.MOODY’S Credit rating Ratings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Opinions, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT Intended FOR USE BY RETAIL Buyers AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL Investors TO USE MOODY’S Credit score Ratings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Views OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN Creating AN Financial commitment Decision. IF IN Question YOU Should really Speak to YOUR Monetary OR OTHER Skilled ADVISER.ALL Data CONTAINED HEREIN IS Secured BY Law, Including BUT NOT Restricted TO, COPYRIGHT Law, AND NONE OF This sort of Data May well BE COPIED OR Normally REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, Additional TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR Stored FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY This sort of Reason, IN Full OR IN Component, IN ANY Sort OR Manner OR BY ANY Implies Whatsoever, BY ANY Man or woman Devoid of MOODY’S PRIOR Prepared CONSENT.MOODY’S Credit rating Ratings, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER Views AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT Supposed FOR USE BY ANY Individual AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT Time period IS Described FOR REGULATORY Functions AND Should NOT BE Applied IN ANY WAY THAT COULD Result IN THEM Currently being Regarded as A BENCHMARK.All info contained herein is received by MOODY’S from resources believed by it to be accurate and trusted. Simply because of the chance of human or mechanical error as nicely as other elements, nonetheless, all info contained herein is supplied “AS IS” without warranty of any variety. MOODY’S adopts all important actions so that the data it utilizes in assigning a credit history ranking is of enough quality and from resources MOODY’S considers to be reputable together with, when suitable, independent 3rd-bash sources. On the other hand, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every occasion independently verify or validate info gained in the ranking procedure or in making ready its Publications.To the extent permitted by legislation, MOODY’S and its administrators, officers, staff members, brokers, associates, licensors and suppliers disclaim legal responsibility to any person or entity for any oblique, unique, consequential, or incidental losses or damages in anyway arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or incapability to use any these kinds of details, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, staff, agents, associates, licensors or suppliers is suggested in progress of the likelihood of these types of losses or damages, which includes but not limited to: (a) any reduction of present or possible revenue or (b) any decline or hurt arising where the applicable monetary instrument is not the topic of a specific credit rating ranking assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by legislation, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, staff members, brokers, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages prompted to any person or entity, such as but not minimal to by any carelessness (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other kind of legal responsibility that, for the avoidance of question, by regulation can not be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency in just or outside of the manage of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, personnel, agents, reps, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information and facts contained herein or the use of or incapability to use any this kind of facts.NO Warranty, Specific OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE Precision, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR Fitness FOR ANY Certain Intent OF ANY Credit history Ranking, Assessment, OTHER Viewpoint OR Data IS Presented OR Created BY MOODY’S IN ANY Sort OR Manner By any means.Moody’s Buyers Company, Inc., a wholly-owned credit score rating company subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of credit card debt securities (like corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and business paper) and desired inventory rated by Moody’s Traders Assistance, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit ranking, agreed to pay to Moody’s Traders Company, Inc. for credit history rankings views and expert services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to close to $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also preserve policies and techniques to tackle the independence of Moody’s Investors Assistance credit score ratings and credit history ranking processes. Details pertaining to sure affiliations that may well exist concerning administrators of MCO and rated entities, and concerning entities who hold credit rankings from Moody’s Buyers Support and have also publicly claimed to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of much more than 5{194d821e0dc8d10be69d2d4a52551aeafc2dee4011c6c9faa8f16ae7103581f6}, is posted annually at under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional conditions for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Economical Products and services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Assistance Pty Confined ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as relevant). This document is intended to be presented only to “wholesale clients” in just the indicating of portion 761G of the Businesses Act 2001. By continuing to access this doc from in just Australia, you characterize to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a consultant of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will right or indirectly disseminate this doc or its contents to “retail clients” in just the that means of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating ranking is an viewpoint as to the creditworthiness of a personal debt obligation of the issuer, not on the fairness securities of the issuer or any variety of protection that is out there to retail buyers.Additional phrases for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit history rating company subsidiary of Moody’s Team Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit history rating company subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Regarded Statistical Ranking Organization (“NRSRO”). Hence, credit score scores assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Scores. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, as a result, the rated obligation will not qualify for particular types of therapy beneath U.S. legislation. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating score organizations registered with the Japan Fiscal Products and services Company and their registration figures are FSA Commissioner (Scores) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as relevant) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and professional paper) and chosen stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit score ranking, agreed to spend to MJKK or MSFJ (as relevant) for credit history ratings views and solutions rendered by it expenses ranging from JPY100,000 to about JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also sustain insurance policies and methods to handle Japanese regulatory needs. ​